Comments on: CSS Reflections https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/ Open Source Web Browser Engine Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:57:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: reaktivo https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24578 Wed, 07 May 2008 15:08:22 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24578 @edified, I did’nt know any other browser that supported drop shadows, appart from webkit based ones, which browsers are those? thanks.

]]> By: edified https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24573 Wed, 07 May 2008 08:51:01 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24573 This reminds me of when Safari was the only browser to support drop shadows. It was like a little goodie that only the Safari users would get to see.

]]> By: vicgundotra https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24560 Tue, 06 May 2008 02:30:30 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24560 Did anyone respond to Gee4orce’s question? I too am looking for a great showcase site ….

]]> By: JAB Creations https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24558 Tue, 06 May 2008 00:25:11 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24558 @ reak, My site is how I learn things and so that I have content I center it around my interests. I cater to no one, exceptionally few people have any criticisms worth considering, and if I did take even one out of a hundred criticisms in to consideration I have made a thousandth of the progress I have.

]]> By: reaktivo https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24555 Mon, 05 May 2008 18:51:38 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24555 @Jab Creations, what exactly is your site about? IMHO I think your site is way saturated, I think great web design is the one fills peoples needs, what’s the need for people to add their own css and javascript, it’s a wrong way of thinking when you expect your users to design your site so that they can enjoy using it, trying to satisfy every user will satisfy no one, I think. I hope you don’t take my comment personally.

]]> By: JAB Creations https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24552 Mon, 05 May 2008 16:48:40 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24552 In my honest opinion Webkit has made the most progress and in the shortest span of time though I have had difficulty being able to track KHTML (as Linux-heads need to put a complete end to the need to go in to the console for people who are not working on the OS itself).

While I do use Firefox (nightly builds usually towards the mid to late part of development) as my default browser hardly a day goes by when I don’t have Opera or Safari open along side it. While Gecko has some decent CSS3 support Webkit clearly has the lead; properties matter most to me as a Web Designer.

As I design and develop my own website I have been trying to make use of CSS3 when and where it’s supported. When I debut Version 2.8 Preview VI people will be able to register and add their own custom CSS and JavaScript though that won’t be for a while. However there is currently a bit of CSS3 support for Gecko and Webkit. I really can’t wait to get some time to see how I could implement some of the latest CSS3 features (this one I may add to the gallery section of my website for example). CSS animation is one of the goodies I look forward to implementing for example.

Any way there are already plenty of CSS3 features added to my site that work really great in Safari, cookie based without the need for registration. 🙂
http://www.jabcreations.com/blog/?prompt=options-basic&css3=1

Keep up the great work folks!

]]> By: Dave Hyatt https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24504 Thu, 01 May 2008 09:20:51 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24504 @TereNovo, I refer you to my first comment (#4 in the list), since apparently you didn’t bother to read it.

]]> By: TereNovo https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24502 Thu, 01 May 2008 04:52:04 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24502 This is all great, but a large goal should be contacting W3C and getting them to implement all of these recent CSS properties into the new versions of HTML and CSS. What’s the point of all this work if only the people with the latest version of Safari/WebKit can even see it? Even the current version of Safari can’t render this. What about Firefox and Opera? Those all have huge browser shares. If only a tiny fraction of the web browsing world can see these new features, shouldn’t a main goal be to expand all of these to everyone?

]]> By: Dave Hyatt https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24500 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:22:10 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24500 @Visited,

1) Yes
2) It will work on inline replaced elements (and inline blocks). It will not work on inline flows like links and spans. (We don’t currently support transforms on inline flows.)
3) The image and its mirror will show up in the div’s mirror.

]]> By: Visited https://webkit.org/blog/182/css-reflections/comment-page-1/#comment-24496 Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:05:32 +0000 http://webkit.org/blog/?p=182#comment-24496 1) If we have an element with overflow:auto, and the scrollbar will show up. Will we see it on the mirror too?

2) Will this work with inline elements? If we have two lines of texts, where will the mirrored lines show up? First line – first line’s mirror maybe under the second line?

3) If we have an image with a mirror effect inside a div with a mirror effect? What will happen?

]]>