Comments on: WebKit Site Redesign https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/ Open Source Web Browser Engine Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:04:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Geoff https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-1155 Fri, 03 Mar 2006 11:17:11 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-1155 If they want ajax effects an easy one to add is canary comments, ajax-ified commenting

]]> By: mckinlay https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-976 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:27:03 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-976 web 3.0… just avoid 3.1 😉

oh yeah… just to be OC

Below are the results of checking this document for XML well-formedness and validity.

Error Line 299 column 7: required attribute “type” not specified.
setCurrentLink();
The attribute given above is required for an element that you’ve used, but you have omitted it. For instance, in most HTML and XHTML document types the “type” attribute is required on the “script” element and the “alt” attribute is required for the “img” element.
Typical values for type are type=”text/css” for and type=”text/javascript” for .
✉

Error Line 306 column 5: end tag for “br” omitted, but OMITTAG NO was specified.
Register ” instead of “>”.
✉

Info Line 306 column 1: start tag was here.
Register

]]> By: AlthA https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-971 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:05:31 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-971 @ Charles Miller: we’re going straight to web 3.0 😉

]]> By: Charles Miller https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-969 Fri, 17 Feb 2006 05:23:02 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-969 Gradient background… detected
Rounded corners… detected
Drop shadows… detected
Superfluous AJAX effects… NOT FOUND

You have achieved 65% Web 2.0 compliance.

]]> By: maciej https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-958 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:24:42 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-958 The gold ring version of the icon is what you get with nightly builds, so you can have both a nightly and the system Safari on the dock and tell them apart. We like to jokingly call it “Safari Gold”.

]]> By: Mountain/\Ash https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-957 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:17:11 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-957 Much nicer, but (to me) the Safari icon with a gold ring just looks wrong.

]]> By: Brian Warren https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-951 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 15:47:00 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-951 “If you are reading this post”

I saw it in NetNewsWire…. so I hadn’t noticed yet.

]]> By: champ https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-950 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:40:03 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-950 very nice!

]]> By: google636 https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-948 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:03:10 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-948 cool!

]]> By: Brian Warren https://webkit.org/blog/45/webkit-site-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-945 Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:00:49 +0000 http://webkit.opendarwin.org/blog/?p=45#comment-945 Nice new look guys. I never equated minty green to WebKit till now…

]]>